Skip to content
Zero to Term Sheet
Try post-money, SAFE, run rate, or liquidation preference.
↑ ↓ to moveEnter to openEsc to close
Zero to Term Sheet

Module 9 · Term sheets

Liquidation preferences

In a sale, preferred stock gets paid before common stock. Learn each type of preference and how it changes what the founders take home.

20 minLesson 2 of 66 sources

In this lesson you will learn

  • How a 1x non-participating preference works, and when the investor converts
  • What participation, a participation cap, and a preference multiple do to the payouts
  • How seniority and pari passu divide a small sale between two rounds
  • Which preference terms are market in 2025-2026

Northwind Labs sells for $40M. Ada, Ben, and the team own 80% of the company, so they think that they get $32M. They get $30M. With a different clause in the same term sheet, they get $24M, or less. This lesson explains the clause that moves those millions: the liquidation preference.

Why a sale counts as a liquidation

A liquidation preference is the right of preferred holders to get their money back before common holders get anything. The word “liquidation” makes you think of a company that closes. But the preference matters most in a sale. The charter treats a merger in which the stockholders lose control, or a sale of almost all of the assets, as a deemed liquidation event. Thus a sale starts the preference, the same as a shutdown. When a company closes, usually no money is left to divide.

This lesson uses one example. Northwind’s Series A investor pays $10M for 2,000,000 preferred shares at $5.00 each. This price is the original issue price. The founders and the team hold 8,000,000 common shares. Thus the investor owns 20% as converted, and the post-money valuation is $50M.

1x non-participating: the larger of two amounts

The standard preference is 1x and non-participating. In a sale, the investor selects one of two amounts:

  • Its preference: 1 × its money, which is $10M
  • Its as-converted share: it converts to common and takes 20% of the sale.

The investor takes the larger amount, never the two together:

Investor payout = the larger of
  the preference, or
  ownership × sale price

$40M sale:
  Preference    = $10M
  20% × $40M    = $8M
  -> keeps the $10M preference

$100M sale:
  Preference    = $10M
  20% × $100M   = $20M
  -> converts and takes $20M

In the $40M sale, the investor gets $10M and the common holders get the other $30M. That is why the team gets $30M, not 80% of $40M.

Predict first

At what sale price does the investor start to get more from conversion than from its $10M preference?

Type a guess before you continue. A guess first, even a wrong one, makes the answer easier to remember.

The sale price where conversion starts to pay more is the conversion point:

Conversion point
  = preference ÷ ownership
  = $10M ÷ 20%
  = $50M

Try the preference terms

Move the sale price in the widget. Then change the participation and the multiple, and look at how the two lines bend.

Simulator

One investor, one sale

Pick the preference terms and a sale price. See how the money divides between the investor and the common holders.

$40M
Participation
Preference multiple
20%
Investor gets
$10M
20% as converted is $8M
Common gets
$30M
$40M − $10M
Common's part
75%
Common owns 80%
Converts at
$50M
$10M ÷ 20%

How this sale divides

  • Investor
  • Common holders

Payout at every sale price

  • Investor
  • Common holders

20% as converted is $8M, less than the $10M preference. The investor keeps the preference, and common gets the other $30M. The investor converts only at a sale price more than $50M.

Participating preferred: the double dip

Participating preferred gets its preference and a share of the rest. Founders call it the “double dip.” The steps for a $40M sale:

Worked example · step 1 of 4

A $40M sale with 1x participating preferred

  1. 1

    Pay the preference

    The investor gets its $10M first.

    $40M − $10M = $30M left

As a percentage, participation costs the common holders the most in small and medium sales:

  • From $10M to $50M, participation takes 20% of the money that common gets with a non-participating preference.
  • At more than $50M, the cost stays at $8M: the $10M preference × 80%. At a larger sale, that $8M is a smaller percentage: 10% of the common money at $100M, and 3.3% at $300M.

Small and medium sales occur much more frequently than very large sales. Uncapped participation also never converts, because the double dip always pays at least as much as conversion.

Capped participation and the dead zone

A participation cap sets a maximum on the total payout of a participating investor, often a multiple of its money. Carta calls caps of two or three times the investment typical. With a 3x cap, Northwind’s investor can get at most $30M from the preference and the participation together. At a high sale price, the investor converts instead:

The payout reaches the cap at
  preference
  + (cap − preference) ÷ ownership
  = $10M + ($30M − $10M) ÷ 20%
  = $110M

The investor converts at more than
  cap ÷ ownership
  = $30M ÷ 20%
  = $150M

From $110M to $150M, the investor’s payout stays at $30M. In this dead zone, the common holders get each added dollar of the sale. Set the participation to “Capped” in the widget, and find the flat part of the investor line.

Multiples: 2x and more

A preference multiple of 2x pays the investor two times its money before common gets anything. With a 2x non-participating preference, Northwind’s investor takes $20M first. In a $20M sale, common gets nothing. The conversion point also doubles, to $20M ÷ 20% = $100M. The 2x preference pays the same as 1x only at $100M or more.

The table puts the four structures side by side. Each cell gives the investor’s payout, then the common holders’ payout, in millions of dollars:

Sale price 1x non-participating 1x participating 1x participating, 3x cap 2x non-participating
$20M 10 / 10 12 / 8 12 / 8 20 / 0
$40M 10 / 30 16 / 24 16 / 24 20 / 20
$100M 20 / 80 28 / 72 28 / 72 20 / 80
$150M 30 / 120 38 / 112 30 / 120 30 / 120
$300M 60 / 240 68 / 232 60 / 240 60 / 240

Cumulative dividends make the preference grow

A term sheet can also add dividends to the preference. With cumulative dividends, a yearly percentage accumulates, the same as interest on a loan. The company does not pay it in cash, but it adds the total to the preference. Term sheets that have this clause usually set a rate of 5% to 8%:

Preference after 5 years
  = $10M + ($10M × 8% × 5 years)
  = $10M + $4M
  = $14M

In a $40M sale, common now gets $26M, not $30M. The conversion point also moves, from $50M to $14M ÷ 20% = $70M. Non-cumulative dividends, which the company pays only if the board declares them, cost the founders nothing. Cumulative dividends are rare, but the numbers vary by data set. Wilson Sonsini found them in 1% of its 1H 2026 deals, and Cooley found accruing dividends in 3% of its Q2 2026 deals.

Seniority: two rounds, one small sale

With two or more rounds, the charter also sets the order of payment between the series of preferred stock. This order is the seniority:

  • Stacked: the newest round is senior. It gets its full preference first, then the round before it, and so on.
  • Pari passu: the series rank equally. They divide the money in proportion to the size of their preferences.

Pari passu is Latin for “on equal footing.” For example, Northwind’s Series A has a $10M preference, and its Series B has a $20M preference. The total is $30M. A buyer pays $25M:

Stacked, Series B senior:
  Series B = $20M
  Series A = $25M − $20M = $5M

Pari passu:
  Series A = $25M × 10 ÷ 30 = $8.33M
  Series B = $25M × 20 ÷ 30 = $16.67M

The common holders get nothing in the two cases. If the buyer pays $40M, the order does not matter. Each series gets its full preference, and the common holders get the remaining $10M.

Simulator

Who comes first: stacked or pari passu

Series A has a $10M preference and Series B has a $20M preference, $30M in total. Move the sale price and change the order of payment.

$25M
Order of payment
Series B gets
$20M
Pari passu: $16.67M
Series A gets
$5M
Pari passu: $8.33M
Common gets
$0
Pari passu: $0

Payout at every sale price

  • Series B
  • Series A
  • Common

The sale pays $25M against $30M of preferences, so common gets nothing. Series B is senior, so it takes its full $20M first. Series A gets the last $5M. Pari passu, Series A gets $8.33M.

What is market in 2025-2026

Practice

Work it out

An investor puts in $6M for 25% with a 1x non-participating preference. The company sells for $20M. How much does the investor get?

Work it out

Use the same deal, but the preference is participating, with no cap. The company sells for $20M. How much do the common holders get?

Quiz · question 1 of 6

Test what you learned

An investor puts in $10M for 20%, with a 1x non-participating preference. The company sells for $40M. What does the investor get?

Key takeaways

  1. 1.A non-participating investor gets the larger of its preference or its as-converted share of the sale, never the two.
  2. 2.With one round and a 1x non-participating preference, the investor converts only when the sale price is more than the post-money valuation of that round.
  3. 3.Participating preferred takes its preference and then a share of the rest. Uncapped participation costs the common holders money at each sale price that is more than the preference.
  4. 4.A preference multiple of more than 1x and uncapped participation are rare in 2025-2026. Treat them as red flags.
  5. 5.Seniority changes the payouts only when the sale price is less than the total of the preferences.

Sources

  1. 1.Anatomy of a Term Sheet: Series A Financing (with the NVCA model term sheet). McCarter & English, Q4 2020.
  2. 2.Q2 2026 Venture Financing Report. Cooley, August 17, 2026.
  3. 3.The Entrepreneurs Report: Private Company Financing Trends, Q2 2026. Wilson Sonsini, September 2026.
  4. 4.State of Private Markets: Q1 2026. Carta, May 29, 2026.
  5. 5.Liquidation Preferences: Standard & Non-Standard Terms. Carta, Accessed November 2026.
  6. 6.Explanation of Certain Terms Used in Venture Financing Terms Survey. Fenwick & West, February 2012.